|Indianapolis Councilor Jeff Miller|
One thing that is concerning about the charging affidavit is the inclusion of purely salacious comments about Miller's personal habits which have nothing to do with the charges, but which appear more at publicly humiliating the councilor. One can only surmise that the inclusion of this evidence was to humiliate Miller into pleading guilty and resigning his highly-competitive seat. It is just not an ethical thing to do. I should point out that Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry is a Democrat who campaigned for Miller's opponent. In the past, Prosecutor Curry has shown questionable ethics on how he he resolved the Omnisource criminal investigation and his use (and expansion) of civil forfeiture. Curry has ran roughshod over civil liberties in this county. Yet local Democrats don't seem to care because he has a "D" on his jersey. Miller's attorney is very right to ask for the appointment of a special prosecutor to try his case.
Let me be clear. I am no fan of Jeff Miller. He is the worst kind of Republican. During the term of Greg Ballard, Miller supported every one of the Mayor's proposed 40 plus tax and fee increases has well as every corporate welfare scheme the Ballard people could cook up. There is nothing remotely "Republican" or "conservative" about Jeff Miller. He is a big taxing, big spending liberal.
But you have to ask yourself why would Miller resign now? He gets nothing out of it. The bargaining chip of his resignation from the council (which would likely be part of a plea deal) is thrown away while getting nothing in return.
And looking at the climate in today's Republican Party, one has to wonder if giving non-sexual massages to 10 year old children (assuming Miller is accurately describing those massages) is a disqualifier for the GOP. On the infamous Access Hollywood video, Donald Trump gloated that his fame allowed him to sexually assault women. Then some dozen women stepped forward to confirm in detail how Trump had done to them exactly what he described in the video. Yet Trump went on to became President. Then you have the case of Republican Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore who, in the light best to him, dated 16 and 17 year old children as a 30 year old man, an action which while technically legal, still makes him the worst sort of creep. In the worst light, one of those children was actually 14 years old and thus under the age of consent in Alabama (16). As an adult, she now accuses Moore of actions that would make him a child molester. As a side note, some mistakenly call those allegations pedophilia. Actually pedophilia is a party type of child molestation that involves children who have not yet started puberty. A 14 year old is outside that window. Still molestation. Just not pedophilia.
I would be remiss if I failed to point out that the Democrats have their own share of sexual predators. At the top of the list is former President Bill Clinton. There isn't a dime's bit of difference between Clinton and Trump when it comes to their treatment of women.
My guess is Miller will still resign. But my guess is his defense attorney told him not to give away that bargaining chip until the criminal charges against him are resolved.
Other than you don't know squat about Clinton as he has been media protected for decades especially his rides on the Lolita Express which MSM knows of but practices omertà. During his impeachment how many Republicans even went into the evidence room? Sorta suggest penis envy? Still, the prosecutor of Marion County does appear to be slime on any number of fronts. Expect more slime from the moribund R party whose brilliance was exposed in the recent addition to the Democrat Party of about the lone Republican worth voting for. Find a fork, stick the R's with a fork...there will be no response....zombies feel no pain
Spot on as usual Paul! We will probably be talking about Miller and Roy Moore again soon. If Moore wins his Senate race it will bite we republicans in the ass!
Checkout these links for more information on Jeff Miller:
I fervently wish your reference to "former President Trump" was not a typo. I do want to point out that although Republicans seem anxious to distance themselves from admitted sexual predators such as Roy Moore and an accused predator, Councillor Miller, as a matter of pure political expediency and a single-minded desire to reward their wealthy donors with huge tax reductions, Congressional Republicans, including the entire Indiana Republican delegation, refuse to speak out against the most prominent predator and abuser of them all-- the current President.
Second to last paragraph...I think you are referencing Bill Clinton and not Trump (?)
Aren't there others on this council with issues; one accused of assaulting an intern & another with a deep state CPS file? What's up with this city ?!?
One California lawmaker suggests there are issues in the Sacramento Statehouse: http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2017/11/29/we-have-rapists-here-in-this-building-california-legislators-hear-horror-stories-of-broken-harassment-reporting-system/
Thanks to those of you who alerted me to the editing error in which I said "former President Donald Trump" when I meant Clinton. I guess I got blinded by my eagerness for that blessed day when Trump is a "former President."
"There isn't a dime's bit of difference between Clinton and Trump when it comes to their treatment of women."
Well yes there is a difference, Clinton was accused of Rape.
Guest, actually Donald Trump was accused of THREE rapes.
Post a Comment