I have, for years, struggled to explain to precinct committeemen the effect of mummy dummy appointments in undercutting their authority at slatings and caucuses. Too often though they focused solely on whether their vote was coerced, and then assumed when it wasn't, that the election was fair. What the focus should be on instead is the large number of mummy dummy appointments to rig the process by diluting, and in some cases, obliterating, the voting power of the grass roots workers. What happened in Hamilton County is the perfect example of how party bosses are allowed to rig the process and render meaningless the wishes of grass roots party workers.
Following the vote tally, Peterson immediately called for unity. Given that his victory margin was due solely to Emigh's appointed mummy dummies, it is unclear how well received that call will be received, especially by party workers who witnessed their authority to pick the chairman undermined by the outgoing chairman and the State GOP Rules Committee.
I find it interesting that part of the order from the Rules Committee allowing the mummy dummies to participate in the election is that the caucus would be closed to the public. According to the statement:
The caucus will be closed with only those on the caucus board,tellers, candidate watchers and staff designed by the State Committee or Hamilton County Central Committee present.No word yet on whether Campbell will appeal the decision to the State GOP Committee, an option she still has under rules.
I hope Laura appeals. However, the state GOP glad handers have already proven that the are sexist by opposing a women who may usurp their "good ole boy" power. I would like to think that in 2016, with 300,000 residents in Hamilton County that the old school GOP would be more forward thinking. Ha! Chicago politics does not have anything on Hamilton County politics.
People think it is not important to fill those precinct spots until someone resigns, dies (or as is likely here in Lake Co) goes to jail. If the spots were full of people who had been working all along, there would be no open spots to fill. Thanks for another great post. We have a dem caucus coming up here on Wed. Will be interesting.
Doing that with the current rules are an enormous task, especially in a county like Marion. You have to find 600 people to run all who live in each precinct in Marion County. (Without a primary voter list mind you and with precincts that are devoid of virtually any Republicans.) You have to remind them that they have to immediately appoint a VPC, in writing, or lose that vote to the chairman. You have to convince them to stay in a thankless job for four years. Even at best, you'd be lucky to fill about 50% of the slots. It's a virtually impossible task.
Paul, it CAN be done. John Livengood did it in 1982 because I was part of that team and the research that helped us win,BUT you are right, it IS very hard. We spent nearly years and yes we DID run pc's and won most the races. BUT the other side made some serious mistakes that allowed us to win. The other side had no serious "stiffing" program to fill vacanies AND at the convention they attempted to deny the right to vote to duly elected pc's who's credentials hadn't arrived by mail by convention day. After protests from the floor, the convention chair was so upset that he shut the convention and allowed us to win a 2nd convention after the State Committee was forced to take control of the local party. BTW, I studied Keith Bulens successful takeover of the Marion county Republican Party. he spent 2 years organizing and building a big tent party. He ran a "rebel slate" for every office AND he ran 191 pc candidates and won at least 116 of them even beating the incumbent Chair's home pc 2-1. Of he spent $250K($2m in todays money),including $40K ($300K in todays money). bulen's organization was the 2nd best Rep organization in the country 2nd ONLY to LOng Island, NY. From 1966 until 1999 it dominated Marion county. It also was, as I wrote ealrier a "big tent" with somethiong for every faction from Richard Lugar to Danny Burton. Finally, it was Kieth Bulen who engineered Reagan's 1976 Indiana primary win. The problem with beating an incumbent NOW it that it takes mone, time and organizartion and NOBODY seems to have that now. Finally, the current chairs father, was part of the original Bulen team
Allow me to share my up-close-and-personal experience. I have been appointed PC in Marion County (I lived in the Ward/Precinct) and when I realized the township chair could fire me at will I subsequently filed and ran. I have been elected PC in Marion County with my township chair's blessings, and one of those times without any township chair blessing [when the ever-gracious, warm, and welcoming BF was alive].
Let me tell you first hand that if you file, run, and are elected PC without kissing the ring, "The Party" will do everything in their power to ostracize and marginalize you. Oh, you will get notifications of calls to caucus but you will not be welcome, you will not be spoken to at township clubs, and you will never ever be allowed more than the very minimum your elected status affords you.
I cannot tell you how often that nasty old woman drove by my home to see whose yard signs were in my lawn and who I was supporting. God rest her soul but good riddance to an incredibly nasty, hateful person who did much to harm the "R" cause in her east side township. But Good God, she sure could carry the water for Kyle Walker and his wife Jennifer Hallowell Walker. I called her Stepin Fetchit Jr.
I know all about the history of factions in Marion County taking over through the election of a new county chairman. What you're missing is the rules changes following your experience. In 1982, Indiana law governed the election of the county chairman and other county party officials. The PCs were elected every 2 years in May and every 2 years those elected PCs would attend the county convention in June to elect new county officers for the party, including the chairman. THE ONLY PEOPLE ALLOWED TO VOTE WERE ELECTED PCS. NO PCs APPOINTED BY THE COUNTY CHAIRMAN COULD VOTE DURING THE COUNTY CONVENTION BECAUSE APPOINTEES WOULDN'T MEET THE 30 DAY REQUIREMENT. So to get rid of a county chairman, you actively recruited people to run for PC and voted for a new county chairman. It was a very democratic process.
In 1986 and 1987, the Indiana legislature passed the "Sweezy Forever" bills. John Sweezy was the long-time Republican county chairman at the time. Sweezy had been part of the Keith Bulen faction which had taken over the party through the process just described." What the Sweezy forever bill did was to place the election for PC and county chairmen on 4 year cycles and to put the election for county chairman in March, nearly 3 years after the election of the PCs. So for the first time PCs appointed by the county chairmen could vote on the election of the county chairmen. So under the new rules the county chairmen could pick his own voters!
Eventually the statutes were repealed and replaced by party rules which did pretty much the same thing. Along the way, the vice-precinct committeemen were also given the right to vote. Under the rules, the elected PC gets to pick the VPC, but the PC loses that right and the appointment goes to the county chairman, if the PC does not certify in writing the PCs choice for VPC within a week. (I think the Ds have an even shorter time period.
So now in Marion County, there are 1200 possible votes for county chairman. (600 PCs and 600 VPCs.) Generally about 10% of the PC slots are elected. I would guess that maybe 5% of VPC (probably less) have been appointed by the PC instead of the county chairman. Doing the math that means 540 + 570 = 1110 of 1200 are votes controlled by the county chairman.
The number of elected PCs has declined substantially as the Marion County party leaders doesn't want people to run for PC and all but discourage it. But even in the heyday of the old system, you'd be lucky to find someone to run for PC in 50% of the precincts. But the key is now that appointed PCs (and VPCs) can vote when before it was just elected PCs.
Things are less subject to manipulation in other counties where there are more Republicans. But in a county like Marion, you have a ton of precinct where there are few if any Republicans. All the county chairman has to do is appoint people to those precincts (as PC and VPC) and other the rules the appointees can live anywhere in the county. Those people appointed solely to vote a certain way during a slating or caucus are called "mummy dummies," a term coined, I believe, by former State GOP Chairman Rex Early.
The bottom line is that now, unlike before, the party county chairmen have huge numbers of appointed PC and VPC slots that can be appointed to influence results. Before it was just elected PCs voting.
One interesting point of the "rules" for Saturday's caucus was that they were explained and then ignored. Specifically, we were told the time limits that would be applied to the four speakers and that they would be cut off if they exceeded the time limits. All was in order until Pete Peterson (affectionately known as "re-Pete") went over his 3 minute allotment by about 25 seconds before there was any hint of a possible enforcement of the time limit.
Overall, the event proved disappointing to those who thought the Party might want a fair and equitable selection process for the county chairman. It will be interesting to see if there is any meaningful attempt to unite an organization that has been dis-united in the last few years.
What Paul's described in his 10:59 post is akin to the Democrat strategy of allowing illegals (non-citizens) to vote. What's the difference? The "Republican" party huh?
Post a Comment