Friday, April 6, 2012

Update On My JEPAC Rating; Indianapolis Bar Association Allows Its Image to be Tarnished by Participating in Political Games

I wrote yesterday about how C. Joseph Russell was playing politics with the IBA's Judicial Excellence Political Action Committee's judicial surveys.   This is a followup to that story.
C. Joseph Russell
Partner at Krieg DeVault

If there was any question that Russell was up to political shenanigans, that was erased by the result of the surveys posted today. I received an 18.1%, with only 116 people returning surveys. 18.1% is undoubtedly the lowest rating a judicial candidate has ever received...by far. There is no doubt that, from the very beginning, the plan was to reopen the survey to get a negative review for the purpose of using it as part of a political campaign.  That's why information was obtained from me under false pretenses and why Russell refused to honor my request that I not be surveyed, a request that has been honored for judicial candidates in the past. 

The problem though is the stunt Russell and the other members of the GOP establishment tried to pull backfired.  By so stacking the deck, they got a score that is not remotely credible and inadvertently reveals exactly what they were up to. The next lowest Republican, Clayton Graham, a person who has never served a day as judge, received a score over three times what I received - 60.0% to 18.1%.    No one is going to believe the 18.1% score is legitimate, especially since I've been an attorney for going on 25 years, clerked for a judge at the Indiana Court of Appeals for 3 1/2 years, worked in every branch of government, was a Deputy Attorney General and litigated hundreds of civil and criminal cases in our courts.  Obviously that doesn't happen unless there is a concerted effort to target an individual as they did with me.  So much for Russell's dishonest claim that the surveys are an accurate reflection of attorneys' views of the candidates.

A couple weeks ago, Governor Daniels called the Marion County judicial slating system a "travesty" and that paying a $12,000 slating amounted to nothing more than "purchasing" judgeships. The Indiana Judicial Commission said 20 years ago that paying a slating fee to receive a party endorsement is a violation of the Judicial Code of Conduct.  At a seminar on judicial selection I was at yesterday, several judges trashed the Marion County slating system, including former Indiana Supreme Court Justice Ted Boehm who said the slating system only produces two winners - the Republican and Democratic party chairmen, and over 800,000 losers, i.e. Marion County voters.

I am the only Republican candidate for judge who refused to participate in slating and refused to pay county chairman $12,000 to be endorsed by the party.  I believe that judges should follow the Code of Judicial Conduct and not pay the slating fee for a party endorsement.  I believe judges need to be independent and that Republican voters and not party bosses should decide who our judicial nominees are.

The party bosses do not like it one bit when you refuse to play the game by their rules.  That's fine.  I expect them to attack and try to discredit me.  That's the political game and I accept that by stepping in the arena.  What I object to though is that the Indianapolis Bar Association, an organization that claims to be nonpolitical and about improving the local bar, would allow itself to so blatantly be used to try to get political ammunition against a judicial candidate.   The IBA's image was badly tarnished today.

MARION SUPERIOR COURT
Number of Replies
Yes
No
Approval
%
Number of Replies
Yes
No
Approval
%
DEMOCRAT
REPUBLICAN
Greg Bowes
129
68
61
52.7%
Robert R. Altice, Jr.
368
356
12
96.7%
Linda E. Brown
282
197
85
69.9%
Lisa A. Borges
225
157
68
69.8%
Thomas J. Carroll
410
281
129
68.5%
Sheila A. Carlisle
257
242
15
94.2%
John M.T. Chavis, II
137
108
29
78.8%
Clayton Graham
85
51
34
60.0%
Steven Eichholtz
301
207
94
68.8%
Amy M. Jones
132
112
20
84.8%
John F. Hanley
379
254
125
67.0%
James A. Joven
166
113
53
68.1%
Grant W. Hawkins
320
252
68
78.8%
Michael D. Keele
390
372
18
95.4%
Mark King
131
70
61
53.4%
Helen Marchal
183
158
25
86.3%
Becky Pierson-Treacy
316
97
219
30.7%
William J. Nelson
305
259
46
84.9%
Jose D. Salinas
224
177
47
79.0%
Paul K. Ogden
116
21
95
18.1%
Mark D. Stoner
279
267
12
95.7%
Carol J. Orbison
212
154
58
72.6%
Heather A. Welch
548
524
24
95.6%
Clark H. Rogers
213
179
34
84.0%


























5 comments:

Nicolas Martin said...

Does the bar association have a positive image with anyone who is not a lawyer? It shouldn't.

The Lawyer Cartel
http://tinyurl.com/6r3ue9y

guy77money said...

Hi Paul,how many judges are there from each party picked in the primary? I am thinking nine but I am not sure.

Paul K. Ogden said...

Guy, 10 are picked in the primary for each party.

Paul K. Ogden said...

Actually a lot of attorneys don't join the bar assocations, Nick. I don't join because they don't appear to do anything to advance the profession. This latest episode, in which the IBA has allowed itself to be a political tool to be used in a campaign, confirms that.

Capt A said...

Paul, not being an insider, how does one find pertinent information on those running for Judge? I won't vote for anyone without knowing their integrity and stances on issues.