Saturday, February 19, 2011

Mayor Ballard Defends Mayor Peterson's 11th Hour Giveaway of Pan Am Plaza, Uses Taxpayer Dollars to Help Private Company Litigate Case Against Taxpayers

Indianapolis Pan Am Am Plaza (Sports Corporation Allowed
Property to Fall Into Disrepair During Peterson Adminstration)
Over at Washington Street Politics, the anonymous blogger criticized the taxpayer lawsuit we filed with regard to the Pan Am Plaza giveaway.  Actually it's a great reason Republicans should not vote to re-elect Mayor Ballard - when given the opportunity he supported Democratic shenanigans that cost taxpayers millions.

In 1985,, the City of Indianapolis entered into a contract in which they gave away a city block to the Sports Corporation to develop the property.  The only "cost" of the property was that the Sports Corporation build a public plaza, i.e. Pan Am Plaza and maintain that plaza for 30 years.    The Sports Corporation could quit the plaza requirement after 20 years if it paid the city $3 million adjusted for inflation, which would be $6 million in today's dollars.

It was a remarkably favorable deal for the Sports Corporation.  But not sweet enough. The Sports Corporation wanted to sell the property, but the plaza requirement made the property worth less.  When Mayor Peterson lost the election, the Sports Corporation, headed by former Democratic Councilor Susan Williams, saw an opportunity.  In late December 2007, while the Peterson administration was literally packing moving boxes to vacate the 25th Floor, a simple resolution was introduced before the Metropolitan Development Commission.  It simply said that the plaza would be reduced to 10,000 square feet and made permanent maintained by the Sports Corporation. There was no mention of the fact the plaza was being reduced by nearly 90%, no mention of the $6 million dollars owed to the public if the plaza requirement was ended earlier, no mention that it was changing a 22 year old deal.

The resolution was summarily passed in a stack of other resolutions.  The nondescript nature of the resolution and the fact nobody came to testify on it, left MDC members in the dark about what they were really approving.  Following the passage of the resolution, the City executed paperwork to change the plaza requirement, moving with alacrity before the Ballard people could take over.

The Sports Corporation though had no interest in maintaining any permanent tribute to the 1987 Pan Am games.   On April 1, 2008, Pan Am plaza was sold with Sports Corporation walking away with millions.  The City's taxpayers got nothing for that city block it gave to the Sports Corporation in 1985.

While going through some city real estate documents, I stumbled across these last minute Peterson administration shenanigans.  I alerted Marilyn Pfisterer of the Indianapolis City-County Council. She was initially very interested in exposing the Peterson misdeads and taking up the issue. She said she woudl talk to the Ballard administration about what I uncovered.  I never heard from her again.

When we filed the Pan Am taxpayer lawsuit, we still thought we were setting the ball on the tee for the Ballard administration. Surely the Ballard wouldn't defend the last minute maneuvering by the Peterson administration to screw over taxpayers in favor of a downtown company led by a former Democratic councilor.  Boy were we wrong. Ballard has zealously defended the sweetheart deal, and even has city lawyers helping the Sports Corporation go after taxpayers who filed the lawsuit.   The pro-taxpayer Ballard of the 2007 campaign was gone when we filed the lawsuit in 2008.  Mayor Ballard's administration had been captured by insiders, people like Bob Grand who sits on the Sports Corporation Board.

The the City and the Sports Corporation filed to dismiss the case. We won in the trial court but lost at the Indiana Court of Appeals.  It is currently on rehearing and if we lose that we certainly intend to appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court to consider the unique issues of law.

The Washington Street Politics blog suggests we are wasting taxpayer money by pursuing the lawsuit. Of course, we're actually trying to recover taxpayer money.  Mayor Ballard does not have to be using City Legal attorneys to work on the case for the benefit of a private company.    WSP makes a good case of wasted tax dollars for attorneys, but it's Mayor Ballard who is solely responsible for those wasted tax dollars.

But, then again, I'm pretty sure Washington Street Politics, the mouthpiece piece of the liberal, big spending, big taxing, taxpayer-unfriendly Ballard administration, isn't worried about the facts.


Pete Boggs said...

Ain't that some sh*t!

Paul K. Ogden said...

Pete, it just is incredible that this was done by Peterson the last two weeks office. Ballard was not responsible for any of it...yet Ballard zealously defends the Peterson adminstration shenanigans against the interest of the taxpayers.

Citizen Kane said...

Ballard is defending it because he wants to lie, cheat and steal also. He (they) don't want anyone thinking that they can prove their misconduct.

Bradley said...

I am a little concerned why the anonymous blogger at WSP is so overly obsessed with you, Paul. It's becoming creepy. I agree with Matt Stone on his blog when he points-out this guy remains anonymous and then attacks you. If he was not anonymous, you could pick apart his record, etc., too. You must be saying/doing things against Mayor Ballard that are true since WSP can only seem to attack you instead of focus on what Ballard has done that is good. Keep-up the good work!

Cato said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Cato said...

All proper arguments should be conducted anonymously to silence the possibility of ad hominem, whether of a positive or negative nature.

In the matter of Ballard's or Peterson's dealings with Pan Am Plaza, it is, however, difficult to see how Paul is germane to the conduct of the Mayors.

Geoff Granfield said...

If there is simply no means by which that you're going to be able to pay back the IRS and you're able to prove it, the plan that you may be a candidate for is named Currently Not Collectible. The offer will not be available to anyone, it is extremely tough to be approved into it, and it is exclusively once the IRS has analyzed your whole financial paperwork that they'll decide for the position of a case. Know the criteria before you apply.