This week President Barack Obama announced that the United States would take steps toward normalizing relations with Cuba, which has been subject of a trade embargo and tourism ban that has lasted for over 53 years. President Obama is right that it has been a policy that's been a resounding failure. From his speech
Proudly, the United States has supported democracy and human rights in Cuba
through these five decades. We have done so primarily through policies that
aimed to isolate the island, preventing the most basic travel and commerce that
Americans can enjoy anyplace else. And though this policy has been rooted in
the best of intentions, no other nation joins us in imposing these sanctions,
and it has had little effect beyond providing the Cuban government with a
rationale for restrictions on its people. Today, Cuba is still governed by the
Castros and the Communist Party that came to power half a century
... I do not believe we can keep doing the same
thing for over five decades and expect a different result. Moreover, it does
not serve America’s interests, or the Cuban people, to try to push Cuba toward
collapse. Even if that worked -– and it hasn’t for 50 years –- we know from
hard-earned experience that countries are more likely to enjoy lasting
transformation if their people are not subjected to chaos....
Most Americans agree that our policy towards Cuba has been a failure. President Obama should be applauded for making a much needed change that could have negative political consequences for his party, particularly in all-important Florida which has a powerful Cuban-American voting bloc. What is maddening though is that President Obama forged this historic change in policy while obtaining no policy concessions which would have helped the Cuban people. A CNN editorial
by Frida Ghitas, a columnist for The Miami Herald, sums it up well:
Let's be clear about this: The embargo on Cuba should have been lifted a long
time ago. And yet it's hard to avoid the impression that although President
Barack Obama had an overwhelmingly strong hand in negotiations, he played it
badly. Badly, that is, for the sake of the Cuban people.
Yet despite Washington having
significant leverage as the Cuban economy teeters and low oil prices threaten to sever its Venezuelan lifeline, the United States
secured virtually no meaningful concessions.
Cuba remains one of the world's most politically oppressive countries. At
the very least, therefore, the agreement to restore relations should have
included substantial commitments on Havana's part to relax the state's grip. But
it did not.
Of course, the release of the
unjustly incarcerated Alan
Gross is welcome. But his release should have been viewed not as a
bargaining chip, but as a prerequisite to any deal at all. Instead, there was a
separate exchange of spies, which Cuba treated as a major victory. The only
concession that has been reported upon is Havana's
agreement to release about 50 imprisoned dissidents. This leaves millions of
Cubans still under the thumb of a repressive state.
With that in mind, the main goal of U.S. policy toward Havana should be helping
the Cuban people live in prosperity and freedom, able to enjoy the benefits of
modernity, complete with the right to free expression and participation in the
global economy. By beginning to lift the embargo, material conditions in Cuba
are likely to improve -- and that is most welcome -- but the process of
introducing political freedoms may or may not advance.
So, as the United States moves
to dismantle the old, failed embargo, let's hope it plays its hand with greater
skill on behalf of the Cuban people moving forward, and extracts from the
government verifiable progress on human rights and individual freedoms. It is
time to help Cuba and its people rejoin the modern world.
Hey, Ogden, Obama should worry about more freedoms for Americans before we go giving orders to foreign countries.
Do you feel free?
The cops no longer even need probable cause, or any reason, whatsoever, to stop you.
We're in no position to lecture any other country about freedom.
Political change in Cuba is eventually going to have to come from within. The Castro revolution proved that can happen. For a "water over the dam" comment, I have to wonder how different Cuba might have been had the S reacted reasonably in that revolution's wake. In the longer run, any action that opens, even a crack, contact with the US, is more likely to expedite the process.
U.S. corporations are mad at Castro because he pulled the plug on their crony-capitalist deals in Cuba.
Cuba was the Ballard Administration extrapolated to an entire country. Batista was entirely bought and paid for by U.S. corporate interests.
U.S. corporations don't want relations normalized until they can run their same scams all over again down there.
They won't see a dime. Obama opened relations with Cuba to keep Russia from playing a chess piece against us.
Post a Comment