A quick cursory look and a nod to the fact that Marion County continues to grow more blue by the day makes me believe that the Republican effort to draw districts favorable to them will be thwarted...but only by a few seats.For once in Jon's life, he's being a conservative. The race for a council majority in 2015 won't even be close.
I agree with Jon that under the new map the Democrats start out with 10 absolutely solid Democratic districts. By my count, the Republicans meanwhile have just four that are solid GOP distrricts (20, 23, 24 & 25), all in the southern part of the county.
That makes 11 competitive seats. Under the maps drawn by David Brooks, he projects that all 11 of these competitive districts, which as the figures show below are all highly competitive, will be won by Republicans. Below I have listed the districts. In parenthesis is the district councilor(s) currently living in the newly-drawn district. (Thanks to Jon Easter for doing that work.) The first number after that is the 2010 baseline Republican number used by Brooks to project a Republican win. The second number is the 2012 baseline number for that district.
District 2 (Gooden) 51.98, 48.85
District 3 (Scales) 55.2, 50.38
District 4 (Cain) 57.37, 51.47
District 5 (McQuillen) 55.57, 50.71
District 6 (McHenry) 52.38, 43.37
District 15 (Pfisterer) 55.85 to 45.3
District 16 (Miller & Shreve) 55.85, 45.3
District 18 (Open) 60.82, 52.36
District 19 (Hunter) 52.09, 43.61
District 21 (Mascari) 50.43, 42.48
District 22 (Lutz) 55.69, 44.75
Of these 11 districts, the Democrats only have to win three to win a majority. The 2012 baseline illustrates a huge drop off in the Republican vote in several of the districts from the 2010 to 2012 elections.
My use of 2012 baseline figures has been criticized because 2012, a presidential year, features a higher turnout, much higher than the municipal elections. It is true that a higher turnout in Marion County benefits Democrats and the 2010 mid-term turnout numbers will be closer to 2015 than will 2012. .
But using 2010 election results to establish the baseline is not without criticism either. First, 2010 is further removed from the 2015 municipal elections than 2012. Marion County continues to rapidly lose Republican voters, which loss is going to be better reflected in the later 2012 numbers.
But there is an even bigger reason to question a 2010 baseline. 2010 was not a typical election year. It was a huge Republican year as Democrats stayed away from the polls in droves.
Most likely the true baseline is somewhere between the 2010 and 2012 numbers. That spells trouble for the Republicans. Rather than pick up just two or three of those 11 districts, the more likely scenario is that the Democrats pick up five or six or more. If the conservative five is chosen, the Democrats would enjoy a 15-10 majority. But the split after the 2015 elections could easily be 17-8 or 18-7.
To those who know about drawing maps for partisan advantage, Brooks fell into the classic pitfall of cutting the GOP districts too close to desperately try to create a majority. (Frankly I'm not sure he had a choice considering how Democratic the county has become and where those few Republicans left actually live.) As a result, there is no cushion in any of the districts. Thus if the Democrats have a halfway decent municipal election, they pick up not a few seats but a whole slew of them.
No, it won't be close.